The Breakdown: Yale’s offense powers past Harvard

Saturday night, Yale did something the previous 20 visitors to Lavietes Pavilion couldn’t: Beat Harvard on its home floor. The Bulldogs’ army of long, physical defenders frustrated Harvard’s offense all game by switching screens and contesting most shots, but more interesting was how Yale, despite 19 turnovers, scored 74 points on 67 possessions against a stout Harvard defense.

The Bulldogs took 29 trips to the free-throw line and grabbed nine of 22 possible offensive rebounds, but they almost always do those two things well. What came as a surprise was their shooting: 51.2 percent from the floor and 6-for-10 on threes. Saturday marked Yale’s fifth-best effective field goal percentage of the season against a Division-I foe, and three of those other four came against bad defenses (the exception being Providence).

Harvard had not allowed any team to shoot as high of a percentage as Yale did Saturday. So how did the Bulldogs do it?

Yale_Harvard_shot_char_1H_Beanpot_Hoops

Unsurprisingly, the Bulldogs tried to attack the rim — and in the first half, they did so very effectively. 13 of the Bulldogs’ 24 shots came in the paint; though three were blocked, nine of the others found net, and Yale drew fouls on two additional shot attempts. Yale’s track record from the perimeter was more mixed — it doesn’t really have any ace shooters and makes just 32 percent from distance as a team — but nearly every deep shot was wide open off of an offensive rebound or against a zone defense, allowing the Bulldogs to make four threes.

Yale_Harvard_shot_chart_2H_Beanpot_Hoops

Yale attempted only three treys in the second period, again trying to take shots inside — but it was much less successful after halftime. Thanks in part to another three blocks, the Bulldogs shot just 4-for-12 inside the paint, as Harvard was generally better-positioned in defense and forced more contested shots. But Yale overcame that in part by doing what it does best — drawing fouls with physical drives, earning free throws and making the most of them (83% for the game).

Yale also continued to knock down outside shots at big times, including an 18-footer from Justin Sears for the Bulldogs’ first double-digit lead and a late three by Greg Kelley, only his eighth trey of the year. Those shots were also open looks, with Harvard packing the paint — but Yale’s biggest shot was anything but open. After Steve Moundou-Missi’s three-point play brought Harvard within one possession for the first time in the second half, Armani Cotton answered with a corner three right in Moundou-Missi’s grill:

Armani_Cotton_three-pointer_Yale_Harvard(Screencap via the Ivy League Digital Network)

“They made every big play they needed to make when [the game] was kind of teetering,” Harvard coach Tommy Amaker said.

The only flaw of Yale’s offensive performance on Saturday was its turnovers — 19 in all, a 28% turnover rate. But even in this regard, it wasn’t as bad as the top-line numbers look. For the game, Harvard only had five steals; the remaining miscues were dead-ball turnovers, including a crazy number of travels called for Bulldogs moving their pivot foot before starting drives. That isn’t exactly a good thing — aesthetically, it might be even more frustrating than steals forced by a good team — but it meant Yale could set up a defense instead of allowing transition baskets off of live-ball giveaways.

And when Yale held onto the ball, Sears (21 points, 10 rebounds), Cotton (13 and 10) and Duren (15) gave Harvard’s defense a physical challenge it won’t see anywhere else in the Ivy League. After two close losses last year, the Bulldogs finally snapped a four-game losing streak on the Crimson, capping off a terrific weekend that left them tied for first place.

“The league is won on Saturday nights. Saturday nights are always the toughest games,” Harvard guard Brandyn Curry said. “That’s when you have to bring it, and unfortunately we didn’t.”

About these ads
This entry was posted in Harvard, The Breakdown and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to The Breakdown: Yale’s offense powers past Harvard

  1. tigerclarkc says:

    Insightful and very informative. Henderson’s Tigers could play the spoiler role on Feb. 22, if his players are still paying attention by that point. Amaker has yet to win at Jadwin. A very wise observer of Ivy hoops once said, “Amaker recruits; Jones coaches.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s